As the defender of the Christian faith, King Charles has faced criticism for not sufficiently representing the wider interests of the British public and the Commonwealth. While many appreciate his charitable efforts, there is a palpable sense of dissatisfaction regarding his engagement with pressing national issues, particularly immigration. Members of Parliament (MPs) are currently under scrutiny for their perceived inaction during this critical time. With some MPs taking breaks while the country grapples with what many terms an "invasion," there is growing frustration among constituents. The public is demanding accountability and a more proactive approach from their favored officials. Reports of alarming incidents involving migrants are becoming increasingly common, yet the mainstream media often downplays these stories. From break-ins to public safety concerns, the silence surrounding these issues raises questions about the government's transparency and priorities.

The lack of law enforcement at public transport systems, such as the London Tube, highlights the broader issues of lawlessness and security. Instances of fare evasion and public disorder are becoming a norm, prompting calls for more robust security measures to protect citizens. Prominent figures like Chris Fip and Robert Gener are urging their fellow MPs to present their findings and concerns directly to King Charles. By demonstrating the realities faced by their constituents, they hope to compel the monarchy to take a stand on these critical issues.

Engaging the public in this dialogue is crucial. MPs need to communicate their intentions and actions transparently, ensuring that the voices of their constituents are heard. By making their public efforts, they can foster a sense of accountability and urgency in addressing the migrant crisis. While some argue that King Charles should remain apolitical, the reality is that the monarchy plays a pivotal role in the governance of the nation. With the current government's handling of immigration being called into question, there is an opportunity for the king to influence positive change.